In a dormant commerce clause challenge to a state regulatory scheme for the training and compensation of apprentices on construction projects, summary judgment in favor of plaintiff is affirmed where refusal to recognize out-of-state registered apprentices facially discriminated against out-of-state contractors without advancing a legitimate state interest.
Continue reading at Tri-M Group v. Sharp, No. 10-2365
0 Responses to “Civil, Commercial, and Labor & Employment Law – Tri-M Group v. Sharp”